Athena Protocol vs Codegraphcontext

In-depth architectural comparison of the Athena Protocol and Codegraphcontext MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Athena Protocol when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Athena Protocol Details

Choose Codegraphcontext when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Code indexing into a knowledge graph, MCP access for AI assistants, CLI-based repository analysis.

Explore Codegraphcontext Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Athena Protocol Coding Agents	Codegraphcontext shashankss1205 Coding Agents
Summary	AI tech lead for coding agents with validation and impact analysis	An MCP server that indexes local code into a graph database to provide context to AI assistants with a graphical code visualizations for humans.
Category & Scope	Coding Agents

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "athena-protocol": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "usage"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shashankss1205-codegraphcontext": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "kuzu"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons