AtCoder MCP Server vs Singapore Proxy MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the AtCoder MCP Server and Singapore Proxy MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AtCoder MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AtCoder MCP Server Details

Choose Singapore Proxy MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Singapore Proxy MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AtCoder MCP Server Developer Tools	Singapore Proxy MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Search AtCoder problems and fetch public problem statements through MCP.	Browse the web and run Google search through real Singapore mobile carrier IPs.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "atcoder-mcp-server": {
      "url": "https://api.ksrnyx.top/oj-mcp/atcoder/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "singapore-proxy-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons