At Eli MCP vs Be Eli MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the At Eli MCP and Be Eli MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose At Eli MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore At Eli MCP Details

Choose Be Eli MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Be Eli MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	At Eli MCP Developer Tools	Be Eli MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Austrian RIS federal legislation: ELI identifiers and verifiable citations.	MCP server for Belgian legislation (Moniteur Belge): ELI identifiers and citations.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "at-eli-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "at-eli-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "be-eli-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "be-eli-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons