Ask Antigravity vs Kimi MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ask Antigravity and Kimi MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ask Antigravity when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: ask-gemini, ask-gemini-edit, fetch-chunk.

Explore Ask Antigravity Details

K

Choose Kimi MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: ask-kimi, brainstorm, batch-kimi.

Explore Kimi MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ask Antigravity Developer Tools	K Kimi MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Bridge Claude with Google's Antigravity CLI (agy) for code review and second opinions	MCP server bridging AI assistants to Moonshot AI Kimi Code CLI for code analysis and review
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ask-antigravity": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@ask-llm/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kimi-mcp-server": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](LICENSE"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons