Aryankeluskar Poke Video MCP vs Clipkit

In-depth architectural comparison of the Aryankeluskar Poke Video MCP and Clipkit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Aryankeluskar Poke Video MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query, max_results.

Explore Aryankeluskar Poke Video MCP Details

Choose Clipkit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Clipkit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Aryankeluskar Poke Video MCP Multimedia Process	Clipkit Multimedia Process
Summary	Search your Flashback video library with natural language to instantly find relevant moments. Get…	MCP server for Clipkit — gives AI agents a video toolbox via the Clipkit schema.
Category & Scope	Multimedia Process	Multimedia Process

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aryankeluskar-poke-video-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aryankeluskar-poke-video-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "clipkit": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@clipkit/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons