Claudinho vs OddsRelay

In-depth architectural comparison of the Claudinho and OddsRelay MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Claudinho when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Live 2026 men's World Cup scores, Fixture and schedule lookup, Group standings.

Explore Claudinho Details

O

Choose OddsRelay when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• You have access to required keys: ODDSRELAY_KEY.
• Primary tools included: sports, events, bookmakers.

Explore OddsRelay Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Claudinho arturogarrido Sports	O OddsRelay Sports
Summary
Category & Scope	Sports	Sports
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arturogarrido-claudinho": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@claudinho/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "oddsrelay": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "oddsrelay-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "ODDSRELAY_KEY": "YOUR_ODDSRELAY_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons