Artefact Revenue Intelligence vs Cloud Tools

In-depth architectural comparison of the Artefact Revenue Intelligence and Cloud Tools MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Artefact Revenue Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Artefact Revenue Intelligence Details

Choose Cloud Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cloud Tools Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Artefact Revenue Intelligence Cloud Platforms	Cloud Tools Cloud Platforms
Summary	Revenue intelligence MCP: RFM analysis, 14.5-point ICP scoring, pipeline health. HubSpot.	Multi-cloud cost, inventory and waste analysis over MCP: AWS, GCP, Cloudflare and OVH.
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms	Cloud Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "artefact-revenue-intelligence": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "artefact-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloud-tools": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@munhq/cloud-tools"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons