Arcgis Mckinney vs Arcgis Toledo

In-depth architectural comparison of the Arcgis Mckinney and Arcgis Toledo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Arcgis Mckinney when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Location Services domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_datasets, query_layer, layer_info.

Explore Arcgis Mckinney Details

Choose Arcgis Toledo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Location Services domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_datasets, query_layer, layer_info.

Explore Arcgis Toledo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Arcgis Mckinney Location Services	Arcgis Toledo Location Services
Summary	City of McKinney GIS — McKinney, Texas open geospatial data (ArcGIS).	City of Toledo GIS — Toledo, Ohio open geospatial data (ArcGIS).
Category & Scope	Location Services	Location Services
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arcgis-mckinney": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-arcgis-mckinney"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arcgis-toledo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-arcgis-toledo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons