Arcgis Austin vs Arcgis Fallschurch

In-depth architectural comparison of the Arcgis Austin and Arcgis Fallschurch MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Arcgis Austin when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Arcgis Austin Details

Choose Arcgis Fallschurch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Arcgis Fallschurch Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Arcgis Austin Developer Tools	Arcgis Fallschurch Developer Tools
Summary	City of Austin GIS — Austin, Texas open geospatial data (ArcGIS).	City of Falls Church GIS — Falls Church, Virginia open geospatial data (ArcGIS).
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arcgis-austin": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "arcgis-austin"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arcgis-fallschurch": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "arcgis-fallschurch"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons