Appwrite MCP vs Site — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Appwrite MCP vs Site
A side-by-side look at the Appwrite MCP and Site MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Appwrite MCP for developer tools work over a hosted endpoint; choose Site for developer tools. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Appwrite MCP when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Site tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
No confirmed install command for Site yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.
Frequently asked questions
Appwrite MCP is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Site belongs to Developer Tools and uses an install path we have not confirmed yet. Pick Appwrite MCP for developer tools work and Site for developer tools.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client. Site has no confirmed install command yet — follow its own setup instructions.
Appwrite MCP is listed as free. Auth: oauth 2.0. Site has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add appwrite-mcp and site-184 as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Appwrite MCP has a quality signal of 76/100 (Great) with 3 views, 0 installs and 72 GitHub stars. Site has 43/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.