Appstore Connect vs Parseable MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Appstore Connect and Parseable MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Appstore Connect when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_apps, get_app, list_app_versions.

Explore Appstore Connect Details

P

Choose Parseable MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_datasets, get_dataset_schema, get_dataset_info.

Explore Parseable MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Appstore Connect Developer Tools	P Parseable MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Apple's App Store Connect API. Manage apps, TestFlight, and more.	Model Context Protocol server for Parseable. Lets LLMs discover and query Parseable.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "appstore-connect": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "asc-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "parseable-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@parseable/parseable-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons