Apple Shortcuts vs Bezelbub MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Apple Shortcuts and Bezelbub MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Apple Shortcuts when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Apple Shortcuts Details

Choose Bezelbub MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bezelbub MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Apple Shortcuts Developer Tools	Bezelbub MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Apple Shortcuts via the macOS shortcuts CLI	Frame screenshots and screen recordings in Apple device bezels (device mockups). macOS only.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "apple-shortcuts": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mindstone/mcp-server-zendesk"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bezelbub-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "bezelbub-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons