Appfigures vs Moxlade — Upwork buyer intelligence

In-depth architectural comparison of the Appfigures and Moxlade — Upwork buyer intelligence MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Appfigures when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Appfigures Details

M

Choose Moxlade — Upwork buyer intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Moxlade — Upwork buyer intelligence Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Appfigures Developer Tools	M Moxlade — Upwork buyer intelligence Developer Tools
Summary	Access your app analytics, ASO tools, and app market intelligence with Appfigures.	Who the anonymous Upwork client is, what they actually pay, and what the market charges.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "appfigures": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@appfigures/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "moxlade-upwork-buyer-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "moxlade-upwork-buyer-intelligence"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons