AppCrane vs Awesome Coolify

In-depth architectural comparison of the AppCrane and Awesome Coolify MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AppCrane when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AppCrane Details

Choose Awesome Coolify when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Awesome Coolify Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AppCrane Developer Tools	Awesome Coolify Developer Tools
Summary	Deploy and manage apps on your own AppCrane instance, the self-hosted PaaS for AI-built apps.	Coolify 4.1.x MCP server — deploy, diagnose, and manage apps, services, and databases
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "appcrane": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "appcrane-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "awesome-coolify": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "awesome-coolify-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons