In-depth architectural comparison of the Apollo.io MCP Server and Obriym CRM MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Apollo.io MCP Server
Customer Data Platforms · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Obriym CRM
Customer Data Platforms · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Apollo.io MCP Server if you need specialized Customer Data Platforms tools running via a local process. Choose Obriym CRM if your workspace requires Customer Data Platforms integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
A
Choose Apollo.io MCP Server when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Apollo.io MCP Server is categorized under Customer Data Platforms and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Obriym CRM belongs to Customer Data Platforms using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Apollo.io MCP Server when you need capabilities focused on customer data platforms and Obriym CRM when you require tools for customer data platforms.