API Test MCP vs ComplyEdge TrustLint

In-depth architectural comparison of the API Test MCP and ComplyEdge TrustLint MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose API Test MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore API Test MCP Details

Choose ComplyEdge TrustLint when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ComplyEdge TrustLint Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	API Test MCP Developer Tools	ComplyEdge TrustLint Developer Tools
Summary	Call the real API and check the response against your OpenAPI spec.	Check prompts against ComplyEdge TrustLint offline rules with article-cited findings.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "api-test-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "api-test-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "complyedge-trustlint": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@complyedge/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons