Antigravityextensiongate MCP vs Mcpdeprecation MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Antigravityextensiongate MCP and Mcpdeprecation MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Antigravityextensiongate MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_extension_gate, classify_extension_gap, issue_extension_receipt.

Explore Antigravityextensiongate MCP Details

Choose Mcpdeprecation MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mcpdeprecation MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Antigravityextensiongate MCP Security	Mcpdeprecation MCP Security
Summary	Paid remote MCP for Antigravity extension compatibility MCP, structured receipts, audit logs, and re	Remote MCP for MCP tool deprecation receipt, structured receipts, audit logs, and reviewer-ready evi
Category & Scope	Security	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "antigravityextensiongate-mcp": {
      "url": "https://antigravityextensiongate.clauxel.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcpdeprecation-mcp": {
      "url": "https://mcpdeprecation.clauxel.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons