Angel One vs Canary MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Angel One and Canary MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Angel One when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Angel One Details

Choose Canary MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Canary MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Angel One Developer Tools	Canary MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Angel One SmartAPI MCP for orders, portfolio, market data, GTT rules, charges, and margin.	Canary MCP server for Interactive Brokers market data, portfolio context, and risk checks.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "angel-one": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "angel-one-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "canary-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "canary-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons