Anagent vs Publish MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Anagent and Publish MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Anagent when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Anagent Details

Choose Publish MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Publish MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Anagent Developer Tools	Publish MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	A registry of AI agent tools — MCP servers, APIs, CLIs, SDKs — kept current by automated ingestion.	An MCP server that helps developers publish their MCP servers to the registry
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "anagent": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "anagent"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "publish-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "publish-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons