Amber vs Hubmesh

In-depth architectural comparison of the Amber and Hubmesh MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Amber when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Amber Details

H

Choose Hubmesh when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hubmesh Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Amber Knowledge & Memory	H Hubmesh Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Long-term memory for AI assistants. Hybrid retrieval, query expansion, auto-topics.	Deterministic multi-hop graph retrieval for RAG. Zero LLM calls in the query path.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "amber-3": {
      "url": "https://mcp.ambermem.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hubmesh": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "hubmesh"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons