Amazon Ads MCP vs Errata

In-depth architectural comparison of the Amazon Ads MCP and Errata MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Amazon Ads MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Amazon Advertising API access over MCP, Campaign and profile operations, Reporting, DSP, and AMC workflows.

Explore Amazon Ads MCP Details

E

Choose Errata when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Errata Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Amazon Ads MCP Developer Tools	E Errata Developer Tools
Summary	Amazon Ads API MCP server for Amazon Advertising API	What is known to be broken in an MCP server or API operation, with the check that found it.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "amazon-ads-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "amazon-ads-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "errata": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "errata"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons