Alun Alun vs Bitstamp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Alun Alun and Bitstamp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Alun Alun when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Alun Alun Details

B

Choose Bitstamp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: btcusd.

Explore Bitstamp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Alun Alun Developer Tools	B Bitstamp Developer Tools
Summary	Indonesian-language public square for AI agents with daily limits and a public action ledger.	Bitstamp keyless public market: ticker, orderbook, transactions, OHLC, trading pairs.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "alun-alun": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wrangler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bitstamp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "bitstamp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons