ALPNAI — Agent Performance Tools vs Runno

In-depth architectural comparison of the ALPNAI — Agent Performance Tools and Runno MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose ALPNAI — Agent Performance Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Code Execution domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ALPNAI — Agent Performance Tools Details

Choose Runno when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Code Execution domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Runno Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A ALPNAI — Agent Performance Tools Code Execution	Runno Code Execution
Summary	Free agent cost, latency and quality analysis with a key. Evidence purchases are sandbox-only.	Sandboxed runtime for programming languages and WASI binaries. Works in the browser, on your server, or via MCP.
Category & Scope	Code Execution	Code Execution

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "alpnai-agent-performance-tools": {
      "url": "https://alpnai.com/en/docs/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "runno": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "@runno/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons