Alive Analysis vs CTlogs.io

In-depth architectural comparison of the Alive Analysis and CTlogs.io MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Alive Analysis when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Alive Analysis Details

C

Choose CTlogs.io when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CTlogs.io Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Alive Analysis Developer Tools	C CTlogs.io Developer Tools
Summary	Query alive-analysis history from any AI client. Tools: list, get, search, dashboard export.	Certificate Transparency search: subdomains, certificate history and hostname keyword search.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "alive-analysis": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "alive-analysis"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ctlogs-io": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ctlogs-io"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons