WebReaper vs Scrapling MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the WebReaper and Scrapling MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose WebReaper when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: WEBREAPER_MCP_TOKEN.
• Primary tools included: MCP tools for scraping, mapping, extraction, and crawling, Stdio and Streamable HTTP server variants, Markdown output by default.

Explore WebReaper Details

Choose Scrapling MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Stealth HTTP fetching, Real-browser and headless fetching, CSS selector parsing.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	WebReaper alex-on-ai Search & Data Extraction	Scrapling MCP Server Search & Data Extraction
Summary	⃣ 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - AI-native web scraper MCP server. Single binary, returns clean markdown, MIT-licensed Firecrawl alternative.	Web scraping with stealth HTTP, real browsers, and Cloudflare bypass. CSS selectors supported.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "alex-on-ai-webreaper": {
      "url": "https://api.openai.com/v1"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scrapling-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "scrapling"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons