AIPOCH Open Science vs Legiscan MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the AIPOCH Open Science and Legiscan MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose AIPOCH Open Science when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AIPOCH Open Science Details

Choose Legiscan MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: LEGISCAN_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: legiscan_find_legislator, legiscan_get_legislator_votes, legiscan_get_primary_authored.

Explore Legiscan MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A AIPOCH Open Science Research	Legiscan MCP sh-patterson Research
Summary
Category & Scope	Research	Research
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aipoch-open-science": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aipoch-open-science"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sh-patterson-legiscan-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "legiscan-mcp-server"
      ],
      "env": {
        "LEGISCAN_API_KEY": "YOUR_LEGISCAN_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons