AIMEAT vs SOKI (想起) — Personal Memory

In-depth architectural comparison of the AIMEAT and SOKI (想起) — Personal Memory MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AIMEAT when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AIMEAT Details

S

Choose SOKI (想起) — Personal Memory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SOKI (想起) — Personal Memory Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AIMEAT Knowledge & Memory	S SOKI (想起) — Personal Memory Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Persistent memory, identity, shared workspaces, skills and tasks for AI agents	Personal memory outside the AI. Due dates, loose ends and old notes come back on their own.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aimeat": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aimeat"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "soki-personal-memory": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "soki-personal-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons