Aicut vs Imageat

In-depth architectural comparison of the Aicut and Imageat MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Aicut when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Aicut Details

Choose Imageat when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Imageat Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Aicut Developer Tools	Imageat Developer Tools
Summary	Generate AI videos, images, audio and staged AI Video Story episodes, and publish them to social.	Generate and edit images and videos with imageat.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aicut": {
      "url": "https://mcp.aicut.pro/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "imageat": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons