AiAkiv Memory vs MemoryPlugin

In-depth architectural comparison of the AiAkiv Memory and MemoryPlugin MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AiAkiv Memory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AiAkiv Memory Details

M

Choose MemoryPlugin when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MemoryPlugin Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AiAkiv Memory Knowledge & Memory	M MemoryPlugin Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Shared long-term memory for AI agents: save and recall context as a searchable knowledge graph.	Give every AI you use one shared, permanent memory. Store once, recall in whichever AI you open.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aiakiv-memory": {
      "url": "https://aiakiv.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memoryplugin": {
      "url": "https://www.memoryplugin.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons