AiAkiv Memory vs Lore

In-depth architectural comparison of the AiAkiv Memory and Lore MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AiAkiv Memory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AiAkiv Memory Details

L

Choose Lore when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lore Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AiAkiv Memory Knowledge & Memory	L Lore Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Shared long-term memory for AI agents: save and recall context as a searchable knowledge graph.	Cross-agent memory over MCP: hybrid recall, knowledge graph, private/shared visibility, redaction.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aiakiv-memory": {
      "url": "https://aiakiv.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lore": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lore"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons