Aiact vs Accessibility AI

In-depth architectural comparison of the Aiact and Accessibility AI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Aiact when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: scan_project, quick_check, generate_inventory.

Explore Aiact Details

Choose Accessibility AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Accessibility AI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Aiact Developer Tools	Accessibility AI Developer Tools
Summary	Scan codebases for AI usage, classify risk, generate EU AI Act compliance reports.	Scan URLs for WCAG 2.1 violations, generate AI fixes, and produce VPAT 2.5 compliance reports.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aiact": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gridwork-aiact"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "accessibility-ai": {
      "url": "https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfRsgE_-xFmkuwtMhmVHJULcvfY4y8SNw81iEJJxJREra6t7Q/viewform?usp=publish-editor"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons