AI Usage vs Markifact: AI Performance Marketing

In-depth architectural comparison of the AI Usage and Markifact: AI Performance Marketing MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose AI Usage when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: usage_summary, session_usage, model_usage.

Explore AI Usage Details

Choose Markifact: AI Performance Marketing when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Markifact: AI Performance Marketing Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A AI Usage Finance & Fintech	Markifact: AI Performance Marketing Finance & Fintech
Summary	Reports real token usage and cost from Claude Code and OpenCode data. Nothing leaves your machine.	AI marketing agent for Google Ads, Meta, GA4, TikTok, LinkedIn, Shopify, HubSpot and more.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-usage": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ai-usage-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "markifact-ai-performance-marketing": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons