Ai·rete·rag vs Ai·rete·rag

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ai·rete·rag and Ai·rete·rag MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ai·rete·rag when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ai·rete·rag Details

A

Choose Ai·rete·rag when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ai·rete·rag Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ai·rete·rag Knowledge & Memory	A Ai·rete·rag Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Author rules from policy docs, then decide: a Rete engine gives the verdict, an LLM explains why.	Auditable rule-based decisions with RAG explanations: a Rete engine decides, an LLM explains why.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-rete-rag-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "ai-rete-rag-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-rete-rag": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ai-rete-rag"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons