AI Rate Limit Tracker vs API Composition Gateway

In-depth architectural comparison of the AI Rate Limit Tracker and API Composition Gateway MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AI Rate Limit Tracker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AI Rate Limit Tracker Details

Choose API Composition Gateway when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore API Composition Gateway Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AI Rate Limit Tracker Cloud Platforms	API Composition Gateway Cloud Platforms
Summary	Cloudflare Workers MCP server: ai-rate-limit-tracker	Cloudflare Workers MCP server: api-composition-gateway
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms	Cloud Platforms
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-rate-limit-tracker": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ai-rate-limit-tracker"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "api-composition-gateway": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "api-composition-gateway"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons