AI Pricing Hub vs InferIndex
A side-by-side look at the AI Pricing Hub and InferIndex MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose AI Pricing Hub for conversational ai work over a hosted endpoint; choose InferIndex for conversational ai over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose AI Pricing Hub when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Conversational AI domain.
- You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
- You want tools like
compare-llm-models, estimate-llm-cost, compare-models-side-by-side.
Choose InferIndex when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Conversational AI domain.
- You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
- You want tools like
search_models, cheapest, compare_providers.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Conversational AI | Conversational AI |
| Quality signal | 57/100 · Good | 57/100 · Good |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Remote HTTP/SSE | Remote HTTP/SSE |
| Auth | Not declared | Not declared |
| Pricing | Not declared | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Directory activity | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | 5 | 8 |
| Full listing | View AI Pricing Hub | View InferIndex |
Tools & capabilities
AI Pricing Hub tools 5
compare-llm-modelsBrowse and filter the whole LLM catalogue and get back a ranked table: price, quality (ELO), efficiency and capabilities. Use this when the user wants to SEE THE FIELD — 'show me models under $1/1M', 'which providers have vision models', 'list open-weight models above ELO 1300'. For a single PICK under a budget use recommend-llm-model; to weigh 2-4 NAMED models against each other use compare-models-side-by-side. Prices come from optimtoken.optimnow.io where reachable; the response's `provenance` says which tier served them and whether they are vendor-verified. Filter by provider, price tier (category), openness, capability, price range, or minimum ELO score. Optionally enrich with business metrics for a use case. Price tier and openness are independent: a model can be Frontier-priced and open-weight at once. Reports both list-price cost and the optimized cost achievable with prompt caching and the batch API. Prices, costs and scores are final as returned: rounded and ranked server-side, and dated by `provenance`. The text block is a numbered table of the same figures.estimate-llm-costCost a workload with EXACT numbers the caller supplies: arbitrary token counts per request and any monthly volume, not just the 10k/100k/1m presets the other cost tools use. Use this for 'about 800 in and 200 out, 4 million calls a month', or to price one named model across every use-case profile. To compare 2-4 named models like for like at a preset volume, use compare-models-side-by-side instead. Provide a model name to get detailed cost breakdowns, or compare costs across all use case presets. Each figure comes twice: list price, and the optimized price achievable with prompt caching and the batch API. Cost figures are final as returned: rounded server-side and dated by `provenance`, with the lever behind each saving, or the reason there is none, named in the text.compare-models-side-by-sideCompare 2-4 named LLM models against all 8 use-case profiles at a chosen monthly volume, showing list and optimized cost for each. Use when the user names specific models to weigh against each other, rather than filtering the whole catalogue. If they also supply their own token counts, or a volume outside 10k/100k/1m, use estimate-llm-cost instead. Every name is resolved against the catalogue and the outcome is reported in `resolution` and in the text: a name that matched nothing, matched several models, or duplicated an earlier pick is stated explicitly, and such a name gets no column rather than a zero cost. Prices and costs are final as returned: rounded server-side and dated by `provenance`.recommend-llm-modelPick a model. Returns a ranked top 3 for one workload under optional constraints, each with a per-constraint satisfied/violated breakdown as the evidence. Use this when the user wants an ANSWER rather than a table — 'what should I use for support tickets under $500 a month'. To browse or filter the whole catalogue instead, use compare-llm-models. Constraints: (monthly budget, minimum ELO, required capability, self-hostability). Returns a top 3 as structured facts — efficiency rank, ELO, list and optimized cost, FinOps flag, volatility, and a per-constraint satisfied/violated breakdown. When nothing satisfies every constraint the query is reported as over-constrained, `recommendations` is empty, and the nearest misses are returned in `nearMisses` instead, each carrying the constraint it failed and flagged as a miss in the text. The ranking is computed server-side and is final.compare-compute-pricingCompare cloud compute instance pricing across AWS, Azure, GCP, DigitalOcean, OCI, OVH, and Alibaba. Filter by region, provider, vCPUs, memory, category, processor, or use case. All prices are Linux on-demand list prices in USD. Not every price column is live: `provenance.priceTypes` says which of each provider's price columns come from a live API, which are static constants, and which are unavailable, and `provenance.staticPriceColumns` lists the non-live ones outright; a savings-plan or reserved rate that appears there is a static estimate, not a live quote. Prices are returned as the catalogue serves them and dated by `provenance`.
InferIndex tools 8
search_modelsFind the exact id of an LLM tracked by InferIndex from a name or partial name (e.g. 'deepseek', 'qwen3 max', 'claude opus'). Returns matching model ids and names, best match first.cheapestCheapest current API offers for one model across direct providers and aggregators, in USD per 1M tokens (input, output, blended 3:1). Stale prices, and flex/batch tiers, are excluded by default. Optional filters (context, tools, JSON, vision, region, no training on prompts, open sign-up) and usage (tokens per request, requests per day) to get an estimated cost per request and per month. Returns the winner in detail and one short line per following offer. A condition that is absent was not published by the provider, it never means "no"; a flag not listed in signals is false.compare_providersCurrent offers for one model, one line per provider and source (direct or via an aggregator), cheapest first (10 by default), with price, quantization, signals and training on prompts when published; the cheapest offer comes in detail. Pass detail: "full" for context, every published condition (data regions, sign-up) and reliability from official status pages on each offer.price_historyPrice history of one model: every offer tracked by InferIndex (daily or weekly min/max/last price in USD, or raw price changes), plus the official price of the model's lab over time. Give either days, or from/to (YYYY-MM-DD), or at (a date) for the prices in effect that day.estimate_costEstimated cost of a workload on one model at each provider: cost per request, and per month if requests_per_day is given, taking the provider's tiered pricing and prompt-cache price into account. Offers sorted by estimated cost, cheapest first: the cheapest in detail, then one short line per offer with its estimated cost.list_gpusGPU types whose rental price InferIndex tracks (H100, A100, L40S…), with the lowest price per GPU per hour in USD for each tier (guaranteed, community, spot) and the number of GPUs of that configuration. Prices are per GPU per hour, as published by each provider, and dated. Tiers are different products and are never compared with each other.gpu_rentalsRental offers for one GPU type: provider, price in USD per GPU per hour, number of GPUs in the published configuration, billing and region when published. One block per tier (guaranteed, community, spot), each with its own cheapest offer, also given per configuration (cheapest_by_gpu_count: the price per GPU of a single GPU and of a multi-GPU node are not comparable); tiers are never compared with each other. guaranteed: capacity the provider presents as not interrupted; community: third-party hosts; spot: interruptible capacity. Prices are as published by the provider, and dated. Get the GPU id from list_gpus.self_host_or_apiIs it cheaper to host an open-weights model yourself on rented GPUs, or to use the cheapest API offer? Returns a one-sentence verdict (headline) and the numbers behind it: the break-even volume in million tokens per day, the throughput the whole configuration must deliver for self-hosting to cost less (required_tokens_per_second: compare it with what your setup does), the break-even utilization when a throughput is known, the GPU configuration and its hourly price, and what the verdict rests on (confidence). Without a volume you still get the verdict and the break-even volume. It is an estimate: the throughput is a published measurement (measured), an estimate scaled from one (derived; estimated for a wide range), or a published minimum (lower_bound: a floor, valid for requests of up to 2,048 tokens in total, that can show self-hosting wins, never that the API is cheaper); or you give your own tokens_per_second. When no published figure decides, the headline gives the break-even volume and the required throughput, to compare with yours, rather than a yes or no, and may point out a dearer setup that published figures do decide (settled_alternative: for comparison, not a recommendation). headline_kind and headline_values give the headline as fields. It declines to give a number (status refused, with a reason) when it cannot do so reliably, for example a closed model, weights that do not fit the requested GPU, or a GPU nobody rents. Hardware rental only: the hourly price the provider publishes for the machine. It does not count the engineering to deploy and run the model, monitoring, redundancy, start-up time, or storage and network costs billed separately.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
AI Pricing Hub
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-pricing-hub": {
"url": "https://optimtoken-mcp.optimnow.io/mcp"
}
}
}
InferIndex
{
"mcpServers": {
"inferindex": {
"url": "https://mcp.inferindex.dev/mcp"
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
AI Pricing Hub is categorized under Conversational AI and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. InferIndex belongs to Conversational AI and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick AI Pricing Hub for conversational ai work and InferIndex for conversational ai.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
AI Pricing Hub has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. InferIndex has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add ai-pricing-hub and inferindex as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, AI Pricing Hub has a quality signal of 57/100 (Good) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. InferIndex has 57/100 (Good) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.