AI Law Tracker vs Sovereign AI Act MCP
A side-by-side look at the AI Law Tracker and Sovereign AI Act MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
A
AI Law TrackerLegal · Remote HTTP/SSEAudited AI-regulation data: laws, bills, news and obligations across US, EU and 50+ jurisdictions39FairAuth: no auth requiredVerdict: choose AI Law Tracker for legal work over a hosted endpoint; choose Sovereign AI Act MCP for legal as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
AChoose AI Law Tracker when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
Choose Sovereign AI Act MCP when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- You have the keys it needs:
SOVEREIGN_API_BASE. - You want tools like
classify_ai_system, lookup_article, search_eu_ai_act.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | A AI Law Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Quality signal | 39/100 · Fair | 57/100 · Good |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Remote HTTP/SSE | Local subprocess (stdio) |
| Auth | No auth required | Not declared |
| Pricing | Not declared | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | SOVEREIGN_API_BASE |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | — | 0 |
| Directory activity | 2 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 2 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | Not listed | 4 |
| Full listing | View AI Law Tracker | View Sovereign AI Act MCP |
Tools & capabilities
AI Law Tracker tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Sovereign AI Act MCP tools 4
classify_ai_systemClassify an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744). Give a plain-language description of what the system does and it returns the risk tier (prohibited / high_risk / limited / minimal), the exact Annex III category where applicable, and the binding Articles — every reference grounded verbatim in the law. USE THIS when the user asks whether an AI system is high-risk or prohibited, what obligations apply to it, or which Articles bind a specific AI use-case. For looking up one known Article use lookup_article; for keyword search use search_eu_ai_act.lookup_articleReturn the verbatim text of one specific EU AI Act Article (1–113), exactly as published in the Official Journal of the EU. USE THIS when the user names or asks for a known Article number (e.g. 'show me Article 6', 'what does Article 5 say'). For keyword/topic search across the whole law use search_eu_ai_act; to classify a system use classify_ai_system.search_eu_ai_actFull-text keyword search across the entire EU AI Act corpus — all Articles (1–113), Recitals (1–180) and Annexes (I–XIII) — returning the provisions that match your terms, each grounded verbatim in the law. USE THIS when you want to find where a topic, term or obligation is addressed but do not know the Article number (e.g. 'where does the law cover human oversight?', 'find biometric categorisation', 'rules for GPAI'). To fetch one known Article use lookup_article; to assess a specific system's risk tier use classify_ai_system.get_compliance_deadlinesReturn the canonical EU AI Act application timeline (the staggered dates each obligation starts to apply, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the Digital Omnibus on AI, in force 27 July 2026) together with the penalty/fine tiers under Article 99. Takes no arguments. USE THIS when the user asks when the EU AI Act (or a specific obligation) applies, what the key compliance deadlines are, or how large the fines can be.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
AI Law Tracker
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-law-tracker": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"ai-law-tracker"
]
}
}
}
Sovereign AI Act MCP
{
"mcpServers": {
"sovereign-ai-act-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"sovereign-ai-act-mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOVEREIGN_API_BASE": "YOUR_SOVEREIGN_API_BASE_HERE"
}
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
AI Law Tracker is categorized under Legal and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Sovereign AI Act MCP belongs to Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick AI Law Tracker for legal work and Sovereign AI Act MCP for legal.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
AI Law Tracker has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Auth: no auth required. Sovereign AI Act MCP has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add ai-law-tracker and sovereign-ai-act-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, AI Law Tracker has a quality signal of 39/100 (Fair) with 2 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Sovereign AI Act MCP has 57/100 (Good) with 2 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.