Ai Incident Db vs Usitc Edis

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ai Incident Db and Usitc Edis MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ai Incident Db when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ai Incident Db Details

U

Choose Usitc Edis when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Usitc Edis Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ai Incident Db Databases	U Usitc Edis Databases
Summary	AI Incident Database (AIID) MCP	USITC IDS (Investigations Database System, ids.usitc.gov) — the CASE
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-incident-db": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-ai-incident-db"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "usitc-edis": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "usitc-edis"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons