Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
T 47746—2026) vs Buyking MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the T 47746—2026) and Buyking MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
T 47746—2026)
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Buyking MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose T 47746—2026) if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Buyking MCP if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose T 47746—2026) when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
B
Choose Buyking MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
T 47746—2026) Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Buyking MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
T 47746—2026) Configuration
Buyking MCP Configuration