AI Audit Trail vs Grantex

In-depth architectural comparison of the AI Audit Trail and Grantex MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AI Audit Trail when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AI Audit Trail Details

G

Choose Grantex when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Grantex Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AI Audit Trail Developer Tools	G Grantex Developer Tools
Summary	Tamper-evident audit trails for AI agents — Ed25519-signed, hash-chained, EU AI Act ready.	OAuth 2.0 for AI agents — scoped delegation tokens, audit trails, and revocation.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-audit-trail": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "ai-audit-trail"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "grantex": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "grantex"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons