ahmedak/defluff

πŸ’» Developer Tools
0 Views
0 Installs

🐍 🏠 🍎 πŸͺŸ 🐧 - Deterministic slop detector for AI-generated prose. Flags filler phrases and clichΓ©s with zero false positives by design (curated phrase list, not a model), returns exact spans plus a pinnable 0-1 score, and runs offline with no API key. CLI + CI exit code + MCP server for agents to self-check their own output before it lands in a PR or doc. pip install defluff

Quick Install

One-Click IDE Configuration
claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ahmedak-defluff": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ahmedak-defluff"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Or

Using an AI coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.)? Copy a ready-made prompt that tells it to fetch the setup instructions and install this server for you.

Documentation Overview

defluff

The deterministic slop check for AI-generated prose. Point it at a changelog, a doc, or an agent's own output and get back the filler phrases to cut β€” plus a CI exit code and a pinnable score, identical on every run. No model, no API key.

CI PyPI Python 3.10+ License: MIT Last commit

Fluffy text gets flagged: defluff lints a sentence full of buzzwords and clichΓ©s, returning the slop spans and an over-threshold score.

Every flagged span carries no information, so cutting them loses nothing. Clean text, same tool, passes straight through:

Clean text passes: defluff lints a plain, concrete sentence and returns a 0% slop score.

What makes defluff worth installing over a one-off grep is the engine around the list: bring your own phrases, per-project overlays, and an MCP server your agents pick up with no wiring.


Install

pip install defluff

Or on macOS/Linux via Homebrew:

brew install ahmedak/defluff/defluff

That's it. No model download. No API key. Runs anywhere Python does.


Quick start

# Lint a file β€” exit 1 on slop, 0 when clean
defluff lint essay.md

# Pipe text
cat draft.md | defluff lint

# Get a bare score for scripts (0.0 – 1.0)
defluff score essay.md

# Machine-readable JSON for downstream tooling
defluff lint essay.md --json

MCP server

Exposes three tools so any MCP-aware agent can self-check prose without bespoke wiring β€” including its own draft, before returning it.

Zero-install via uvx (recommended) β€” pulls the package and the mcp extra on first run:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "defluff": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["--from", "defluff[mcp]", "defluff-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Or install it and run the entry point directly:

pip install "defluff[mcp]"
defluff-mcp
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "defluff": { "command": "defluff-mcp" }
  }
}

Published to the MCP Registry as io.github.ahmedak/defluff (see server.json).

mcp-name: io.github.ahmedak/defluff

ToolArgsReturns
slop_detecttext: strslop_score, spans (text, category, weight, offsets), categories, lexicon_version
slop_addpattern: str, category: str, scope: "user"|"project"adds a phrase to the lexicon overlay
slop_ignorepattern: str, scope: "user"|"project"suppresses a phrase (e.g. domain jargon)

Common use cases

  • Agent self-correction β€” call slop_detect on a draft and revise the flagged phrases before returning it. Zero wiring, one session, no second model in the loop.
  • CI gate on generated content β€” fail the build when an AI-drafted changelog or doc ships full of "furthermore" and "robust." Deterministic + exit codes + a pinnable lexicon is what an LLM-judge gate can't give you.
  • Writing assistant feedback β€” highlight the exact phrases an editor would cut, instead of a vague "this sounds AI."
  • A reward component for fine-tuning β€” see reward loops for caveats; on its own it's gameable.

Why defluff?

Every "AI detector" tries to classify whether text was AI-generated β€” a hard, unreliable problem. defluff asks a different question: does this text contain removable filler? That's deterministic, and it's true whether a human or an LLM wrote "at the end of the day."

proselint is the closest prior art β€” deterministic, no model β€” but emits yes/no warnings rather than a tunable density score, and isn't built around a list you swap, overlay, or pin.

A grep over a word list gives you raw hits. defluff gives you what you'd otherwise have to build around that list:

  • An MCP server β€” agents self-check with zero wiring.
  • Markdown- and code-aware β€” strips code fences, inline code, and URLs first.
  • Whole-word matching β€” "foster" won't fire inside "fostering".
  • A normalized score instead of a hit count β€” filler density, so one threshold works on a tweet or a 5,000-word doc.
  • Overlap handling β€” "at the end of the day" overlapping "end of the day" counts each word once (longest-match-wins).
  • Exit codes, JSON, and char-offset spans β€” drop into CI, pre-commit, and editor tooling.
  • A pinnable lexicon hash β€” prove the ruler didn't move between runs.

Bring your own slop

defluff lint draft.md --lexicon team-slop.md
# team-slop.md
- circle back
- low-hanging fruit
- boil the ocean
paradigm shift

One phrase per line (# comments and -/* markers ignored). These layer on top of the built-in defaults and report under a neutral custom category. For real categories and per-phrase weights, use a .json list (see Lexicon overlays).

Ready-made domain packs

defluff lint post.md --pack marketing-growth
defluff lint post.md --pack marketing-growth,ai-llm   # stack several
PackCatchesPackCatches
corporate-linkedinoffice jargoncrypto-web3crypto hype
startup-vcpitch-deck speakpr-press-releasepress-release boilerplate
marketing-growthhype copyacademicresearch hedging
ai-llmLLM tellswellness-selfhelpinfluencer-speak
social-mediaX/Twitter engagement-bait

List them with defluff packs. High-false-positive terms (e.g. pivot, detox) ship commented-out so they're inert until you opt in. See the packs README.

Batteries-included defaults

~130 curated patterns across five weighted categories, case-insensitive, whole-word matched:

CategoryWhat it catchesExamples
ai-vocabWords disproportionately overused by LLMsdelve, tapestry, nuanced, pivotal, robust, showcase
clicheHollow idioms that add no informationat the end of the day, move the needle, circle back, game changer
hedgeEmpty qualifiersit should be noted that, needless to say, basically, essentially
corporateBuzzword inflationleverage, synergy, actionable insights, cutting-edge, scalable
transitionFiller connectives LLMs reach for by defaultfurthermore, moreover, in conclusion, first and foremost

Rhetorical patterns (beyond the list)

Some AI tells are sentence shapes, not fixed phrases β€” the antithesis: it's not X, it's Y, not just a list but a runtime. A regex pattern layer catches these under a rhetoric category:

ModeWhat it looks forDefaultWhy
Compound (confident)full shape: it's not X, it's Y Β· not just X but Yonthe second clause proves the rhetorical move β€” rarely a false alarm
Fragment (guessing)bare X, not Y β€” e.g. a signal, not a verdictoff, --pack rhetoricalso fires on plain corrections (shipped Tuesday, not Wednesday)

Each match counts as one unit toward the score regardless of length. Turning on fragment mode changes the lexicon hash.

defluff lint draft.md                  # compound antithesis caught by default
defluff lint draft.md --pack rhetoric  # also catch the punchy "X, not Y" fragment
defluff lint draft.md --category rhetoric   # gate CI on antithesis alone
Same sentence run twice: the default catches the compound antithesis; --pack rhetoric also catches the short punchy fragment form.

Python API

import defluff

report = defluff.detect("It is worth noting that we should leverage synergies.")
print(report.slop_score)   # 0.0 – 1.0
print(report.spans)        # flagged phrase locations + categories

score = defluff.score(text)       # bare float
clean = defluff.is_slop(text)     # bool at default threshold

lex = defluff.load_lexicon()                # pin for reproducible runs
score = defluff.score(text, lexicon=lex)

SlopReport fields:

FieldTypeNotes
slop_scorefloatClamped [0, 1] β€” use for thresholds
slop_densityfloatRaw unclamped β€” better gradient for reward loops
spanslist[Span]Per hit: text, category, weight, char offsets into the cleaned text (see Limitations)
categoriesdict[str, float]Per-category density
n_wordsintToken count
low_confidenceboolTrue when n_words < 20
lexicon_versionstrSHA prefix of resolved entry set

Lexicon overlays and versioning

The bundled lexicon is the baseline; layer on top without editing the package:

# "synergy" is slop on this machine
defluff lexicon add "synergy" --category corporate --scope user

# "leverage" is fine in this repo (finance context) β€” commit this with the repo
defluff lexicon rm "leverage" --scope project
git add .defluff/ignore.json && git commit -m "allow 'leverage' in finance context"
  • User overlay (~/.config/defluff/) β€” machine-wide, not committed
  • Project overlay (.defluff/ at git root) β€” per-repo, commit it for your whole team

Writes are atomic and cross-process locked; a corrupt overlay is warned and skipped β€” detect() never crashes.

Every resolved lexicon (bundled + overlays + packs) carries a short content hash, printed on every run (lexicon: 2cc05ba84457) and exposed as SlopReport.lexicon_version. Pass lexicon=defluff.load_lexicon() once and every call scores against the same ruler β€” pinnable for CI baselines and RL rewards, and auditable since the hash changes if and only if the resolved entry set changes. Each release ships a dated lexicon with a changelog (CHANGELOG.md); ai-vocab is expected to turn over release to release, cliche/hedge/corporate/transition are near-stable.


Reading the output and setting the threshold

  1. The spans β€” the exact filler phrases, with category. Deterministic, reliable. Act on these.
  2. The score β€” slop_score = flagged words Γ· total, weighted by category (ai-vocab counts a little more, transition a little less). 0.20 β‰ˆ "a fifth of this text is listed filler." Usually 0.0–1.0; can edge slightly above on text that's almost nothing but slop. Instead of being a quality quantfier, its just a tripwire that drives the CI exit code.

Pick a threshold based on how filler-dense the text is allowed to be:

--thresholdMeaningGood for
0.05~5% filler β€” strictmarketing copy, landing pages, customer-facing text
0.08 (default)~8% filler β€” a tripwire for triagegeneral prose, blog drafts
0.12–0.20only flag heavy paddingtechnical docs that legitimately use robust, scalable, in order to

The default 0.08 is provisional β€” hand-chosen, not yet calibrated on a labeled corpus (hence the [threshold provisional] tag). For a hard CI gate, set your own threshold and suppress your domain's vocabulary first (below).


Use in CI

Technical writing β€” API docs, ADRs, RFCs β€” legitimately uses words like robust, scalable, in order to. Suppress your project's domain vocabulary first:

defluff lexicon rm "scalable" --scope project
defluff lexicon rm "in order to" --scope project
git add .defluff/ignore.json && git commit -m "defluff: allow domain vocabulary"

Then gate only on the categories you trust, not all five:

- name: Check AI-generated content for slop
  # --category ai-vocab,hedge gates only on the highest-precision categories
  run: cat generated_output.md | defluff lint --category ai-vocab,hedge --threshold 0.1

Exit code 1 fails the step, 0 passes.


Use with pre-commit

# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: local
    hooks:
      - id: defluff
        name: defluff slop check
        entry: defluff lint
        language: system
        types: [markdown]

Use in reward loops (experimental)

A deterministic, non-differentiable scalar for filler density can be a small component of a reward mix β€” but it's gameable alone: a model optimized purely against a fixed phrase list learns to paraphrase the filler rather than remove it. Pair it with a real quality signal (human or LLM judge); we don't yet have a published training run showing it helps.

lex = defluff.load_lexicon()  # pin once
reward = lambda text: -defluff.detect(text, lexicon=lex).slop_density  # unclamped, better gradient

delta = defluff.compare(draft_v1, draft_v2, lexicon=lex)
# {"score_a": 0.31, "score_b": 0.18, "delta": -0.13,
#  "improved": [...], "regressed": [...]}  # set diff of flagged phrases, not a semantic diff

CLI reference

defluff lint [FILE] [--json] [--threshold FLOAT] [--category CATS] [--lexicon PATH] [--pack NAMES] [--no-project-overlay]
defluff score [FILE] [--pack NAMES] [--no-project-overlay]
defluff packs          # list bundled domain packs

defluff lexicon list   [--category CATEGORY] [--scope SCOPE] [--json]
defluff lexicon add    PATTERN --category CATEGORY [--scope SCOPE] [--weight FLOAT]
defluff lexicon rm     PATTERN [--scope SCOPE]
  • --category β€” comma-separated; only spans in those categories count toward the exit-code decision (still reports all hits). Valid: ai-vocab, cliche, hedge, corporate, transition, custom, rhetoric.
  • --lexicon PATH β€” layers your phrases on top of the defaults. .txt/.md is one phrase per line (lands in custom); .json carries explicit categories and weights.
  • --pack NAMES β€” comma-separated domain packs. rhetoric is reserved for the pattern pack, enabling the opt-in X, not Y antithesis fragment.

Exit codes for defluff lint: 0 = clean Β· 1 = slop Β· 2 = bad input.


Accuracy

defluff is a deterministic matcher, not a trained classifier, so the metric that matters is precision β€” when it flags something, is it actually removable filler? On a 50-example hand-labeled set (eval/validation.jsonl) spanning clear slop, clean prose, and jargon-as-content traps (e.g. "the robust standard errors", "pivotal trials"), at the default threshold:

MetricScoreReading
Precision1.000 false positives β€” clean prose and legitimate jargon were not flagged
Recall0.65bounded by lexicon coverage

Reproduce: python eval/score.py eval/validation.jsonl

Misses are novel buzzwords the lexicon hasn't seen yet (e.g. "operationalize the ideation funnel") β€” the known limit of a list-based matcher, not noise. Recall on listed filler is 1.00 and will rise as the lexicon grows, but won't reach 1.00 against open-ended novel jargon without a semantic layer.

Caveats: the set is small and labeled by the author β€” a sanity check on precision, not an independently adjudicated benchmark.


Limitations

  • It matches a known list by design β€” it doesn't understand text. Novel buzzwords are missed; this is the trade for being deterministic, local, and reproducible (no model, no API key, pinnable hash). Pair with an LLM judge if you need semantic detection of novel filler.
  • Domain jargon is contextual. "leverage" in a finance document is real content. Read the flagged spans; suppress false positives with defluff lexicon rm (adds to an ignore list, doesn't delete from the bundled lexicon).
  • Span offsets are into the cleaned text. defluff strips code fences, inline code, URLs, and markdown markup before matching, so offsets won't line up with your original document β€” match on span.text, not raw offsets, against marked-up source.
  • custom is read-only-via-file. Phrases from a --lexicon file land in custom, but defluff lexicon add --category custom is rejected β€” add only takes the five curated categories.
  • English only in v0.
  • Short texts (< 20 words) get low_confidence: true β€” the denominator is floored at 20 so one phrase can't read as 100% slop on a two-sentence input.

Contributing

The easiest contribution is adding a missed filler phrase:

  1. Add it to src/defluff/data/lexicon-v1.json with the right category
  2. pytest β€” smoke tests catch boundary errors
  3. PR with one or two examples of the phrase in the wild

See CONTRIBUTING.md for code setup and guidelines.


License

MIT

Related MCP Servers

Moxie-Docs-MCPβ˜… Featured

MCP & Agent Skills for Automated Documentation, and codebase conventions + context

πŸ’» Developer Tools2 views
3KniGHtcZ/codebeamer-mcp

πŸ“‡ ☁️ 🍎 πŸͺŸ 🐧 - Codebeamer ALM integration for managing work items, trackers, and projects. Provides 17 tools for reading and writing items, associations, references, comments, and risk management data via Codebeamer REST API v3.

πŸ’» Developer Tools1 views
21st-dev/Magic-MCP

Create crafted UI components inspired by the best 21st.dev design engineers.

πŸ’» Developer Tools0 views
a-25/ios-mcp-code-quality-server

πŸ“‡ 🏠 🍎 - iOS code quality analysis and test automation server. Provides comprehensive Xcode test execution, SwiftLint integration, and detailed failure analysis. Operates in both CLI and MCP server modes for direct developer usage and AI assistant integration.

πŸ’» Developer Tools0 views

Engagement

Views
0
Installs
0
Upvotes
0

Views and upvotes are unique per visitor network (hashed IP). Installs count copy actions.

Status

Health: Not checked yet

We have not completed a health check for this listing yet.

Last checked: 7/28/2026, 8:06:12 AM

Unclaimed listing (imported or pending owner verification). Claim it β†’
β˜… Spotlight Slot

Feature Your MCP Server

Get maximum visibility for your server across our directory, search results, and detail pages.

Spotlight Your Server

Own this project?

This directory is pre-filled from public sources. Claim via GitHub README, site badge, or DNS TXT to get the verified badge and attach your website.

Claim this listing

Promote this listing

Optional paid placement. Free listings stay free forever.

Share & Embed

Add our SVG badge (dark/light directory styles) or embeddable widget to your site.