AgnicPay vs Sivut SEC Crypto Filing Radar

In-depth architectural comparison of the AgnicPay and Sivut SEC Crypto Filing Radar MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose AgnicPay when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AgnicPay Details

Choose Sivut SEC Crypto Filing Radar when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sivut SEC Crypto Filing Radar Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A AgnicPay Finance & Fintech	Sivut SEC Crypto Filing Radar Finance & Fintech
Summary	X402 payment MCP for AI agents. Auto-pay 300+ APIs with USDC on Base and Solana.	SEC EDGAR crypto filing radar MCP with x402-paid Base USDC data URLs.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agnicpay": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "agnicpay"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sivut-sec-crypto-filing-radar": {
      "url": "https://pay.sivut.co"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons