Agentrisk vs InterAI Risk Oracle

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agentrisk and InterAI Risk Oracle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Agentrisk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agentrisk Details

Choose InterAI Risk Oracle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore InterAI Risk Oracle Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Agentrisk Developer Tools	InterAI Risk Oracle Developer Tools
Summary	Risk guardrails for AI trading agents. Your agent proposes; your policy decides.	Policy gate and signed trust receipts for autonomous agent actions.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentrisk-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "interai-risk-oracle": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "interai-risk-oracle"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons