Agentql vs Lyssna

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agentql and Lyssna MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agentql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agentql Details

L

Choose Lyssna when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lyssna Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agentql Developer Tools	L Lyssna Developer Tools
Summary	Query webpages and extract structured data using natural language	Query and summarize research data across tests and surveys
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentql": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcparmory-github"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lyssna": {
      "url": "https://www.lyssna.com/features/mcp-server/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons