AgentPhone vs Brivvy MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the AgentPhone and Brivvy MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AgentPhone when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AgentPhone Details

Choose Brivvy MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Brivvy MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AgentPhone Developer Tools	Brivvy MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Give AI agents real phone numbers, messages, and voice calls via MCP.	Brivvy MCP (OAuth): on-brand AI content, voice rules, templates, glossary.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentphone": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "agentphone-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "brivvy-mcp": {
      "url": "https://mcp.brivvy.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons