Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
AgentIndex x402 vs Tenjin
In-depth architectural comparison of the AgentIndex x402 and Tenjin MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
AgentIndex x402
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Tenjin
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose AgentIndex x402 if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a local process. Choose Tenjin if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
A
Choose AgentIndex x402 when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
T
Choose Tenjin when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
AgentIndex x402 Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Tenjin Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
AgentIndex x402 Configuration
Tenjin Configuration