Agentic Ads vs Lulu Ads — Publisher Concierge

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agentic Ads and Lulu Ads — Publisher Concierge MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agentic Ads when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agentic Ads Details

Choose Lulu Ads — Publisher Concierge when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lulu Ads — Publisher Concierge Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agentic Ads Developer Tools	Lulu Ads — Publisher Concierge Developer Tools
Summary	Ad network for AI agents — monetize MCP servers with contextual ads. 70% revenue share.	Self-serve publisher onboarding for Lulu Ads. 70% CPA, disclosed sponsored field.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentic-ads": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "agentic-ads",
        "--stdio"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lulu-ads-publisher-concierge": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "lulu-ads"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons