Agenthook vs Imageat — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Agenthook vs Imageat
A side-by-side look at the Agenthook and Imageat MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Agenthook for multimedia process work as a local process; choose Imageat for multimedia process as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Agenthook when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
imageat_generate_videoText-to-video / image-to-video. Returns a CDN mp4 URL.
imageat_check_creditsCurrent credit balance.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Agenthook is categorized under Multimedia Process and uses a local stdio subprocess. Imageat belongs to Multimedia Process and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Agenthook for multimedia process work and Imageat for multimedia process.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Agenthook has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Imageat has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add agenthook and imageat as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Agenthook has a quality signal of 40/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 1 GitHub stars. Imageat has 47/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.