AgentBoard vs Meridian — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
AgentBoard vs Meridian
In-depth architectural comparison of the AgentBoard and Meridian MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
AgentBoard
Knowledge & Memory · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Meridian
Knowledge & Memory · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose AgentBoard if you need specialized Knowledge & Memory tools running via a local process. Choose Meridian if your workspace requires Knowledge & Memory integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
A
Choose AgentBoard when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
AgentBoard is categorized under Knowledge & Memory and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Meridian belongs to Knowledge & Memory using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select AgentBoard when you need capabilities focused on knowledge & memory and Meridian when you require tools for knowledge & memory.