Agent Revenue Copilot vs Frisk

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent Revenue Copilot and Frisk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agent Revenue Copilot when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agent Revenue Copilot Details

Choose Frisk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Frisk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agent Revenue Copilot Finance & Fintech	Frisk Finance & Fintech
Summary	MCP and x402 starter audit for legal AI agent revenue routes and payout verification.	Screen the counterparty of an x402 payment before an agent pays it. Runs offline by default.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-revenue-copilot": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github:Olddun/earn10-clawtasks-deliverables"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "frisk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "frisk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons