Agent Q vs Seline

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent Q and Seline MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Agent Q when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agent Q Details

Choose Seline when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Seline Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Agent Q Developer Tools	Seline Developer Tools
Summary	Local MCP server for requesting signatures from Agent-Q Firmware.	Local MCP server for Seline Analytics API
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-q": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "agent-q"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seline": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@seline-analytics/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons